May 14, 2008

‘This is the floor; we’re underneath it’

House Republicans meet every Wednesday morning to talk about strategy and direction, and most of the time, the meetings seem to improve GOP morale. Two weeks ago, Roll Call noted that Minority Leader John Boehner received a standing ovation when he explained to the caucus that they had nothing to worry about.

At a minimum, he said at the time, Republicans know precisely how to keep open “red” districts in GOP hands — nationalize the races, tie the Dems to Obama and Pelosi. Winning over “blue” districts is trickier, the Republican leadership said, but holding onto existing seats isn’t nearly as difficult.

Now that Boehner’s strategy has failed three times in three months in three reliably-Republican districts, Republican leaders aren’t getting standing ovations anymore.

House Republican leaders on Wednesday tried to quell internal dissent following the party’s third special election loss this year in a race in Mississippi yesterday.

National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Cole of Oklahoma accepted blame for the loss during a closed-door meeting with his GOP colleagues, according to members in attendance, but neither he nor Republican Leader John A. Boehner of Ohio announced any major changes atop the leadership tree or at the campaign committee.

“It was a very somber meeting,” said one lawmaker leaving the meeting who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Former NRCC Chairman Tom Davis, the Virginia Republican who is retiring this year, seems to have largely given up on his party’s chances. “This is the floor,” Davis said, stopping his foot on the concrete. “We’re underneath it.”

There have been rumors that Davis might replace Cole soon. Cole told reporters, “Nobody’s talking to me about anything like that yet, but I said ‘yet.”’

Cole’s not the only one looking shaky. Even Boehner’s future is looking less than secure.

NBC News’ Chuck Todd reported this morning that he’s “already been hearing whisper campaigns about John Boehner, the Republican leader, people are thinking about challenging him.” Politico’s Mike Allen added, “Whispers among some House Republicans about trying to replace Cole with Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), who was NRCC chairman from 1998 to 2002. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) also has to watch his back. House conservatives especially restive.”

When Republican House members are leaking word about possibly deposing their leader, you know a sense of panic has become rather pervasive.

For what it’s worth, Cole has a new spin.

“Clearly, we have got problems that are deep and serious in terms of how we are going to do in the fall elections,” Cole said. “Having said that … we haven’t lost as a party because of the ideological agenda on the other side. The obvious challenge we face is we had somebody running as a Republican, pro-life, pro-gun, who wants to cut taxes, wants to control spending. That’s not particularly in step with where the Democratic majority is. So, that is going to create some opportunities for us. I think those issues clarify and reinforce [our agenda].”

In other words, Cole is saying that a conservative Dem can beat a conservative Republican in a conservative district, which explains the GOP’s three recent special-election defeats.

There might be a kernel of truth to this. The Dems who’ve won in Louisiana and Mississippi have not exactly been from the liberal wing of the party. They’re Dems, but they’re to the right of the Democratic mainstream on several hot-button issues.

But as far as Cole and the NRCC are concerned, that should be cold comfort. Right-leaning Dems are winning in right-leaning districts. More liberal Dems are excelling elsewhere.

Either way, people don’t want to vote for Republicans.

 
Discussion

What do you think? Leave a comment. Alternatively, write a post on your own weblog; this blog accepts trackbacks.

18 Comments
1.
On May 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, Tamalak said:

“The Dems who’ve won in Louisiana and Mississippi have not exactly been from the liberal wing of the party. They’re Dems, but they’re to the right of the Democratic mainstream on several hot-button issues.”

And that’s why I think we should be a lot nicer to Hillary/Blue Dog democrats.

Yes, we may sniff at them from behind our martinis as not being “true progressives”. But if it weren’t for them, we would be in a very, very bad place. “true progressives” make up maybe 20% of the population.

We need the Blues to restore some kind of sanity to the reddest of the red areas. So can’t we all just get along? The tent is big enough for all of us.

2.
On May 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, Former Dan said:

Of course the Repubs can fall back to Plan X and run on the excellence of their record.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahah! Or it least it would be if their record didn’t cause so much goddamned misery and death in the first place.

I suspect that the Repubs will refer to the times they were mailed a box or two of crap as the “Good Old Days” for a while.

3.
On May 14th, 2008 at 12:56 pm, Furious said:

The once-vaunted Republican marketing machine has fallen and can’t get up. On Monday, House minority leader John Boehner (R-OH) unveiled a new slogan for the GOP, only to learn that “The Change You Deserve,” was fittingly already in use to market the anti-depressant drug Effexor. Now a central promise of the Republicans’ 2008 rebranding effort, to balance the budget by 2012, is dead on arrival. As it turns out, Republican nominee John McCain already abandoned his short-lived, first term balanced budget pledge.

For the details, see:
“House GOP Makes, McCain Breaks 2012 Balanced Budget Promise.”

4.
On May 14th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, Curmudgeon said:

“Wait, I thought you said we could create our own reality just by closing our eyes real tight and tapping our heels together three times. You mean it doesn’t really work like that??” ;)

5.
On May 14th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, Memekiller said:

By extension, left-leaning Republicans are winning in left-leaning districts.

6.
On May 14th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, PJ said:

“Can’t we all just get along?”

Yes we can, once the so-called Culture Wars are off the table and we start talking about climate change, recession and war as the problems of Everyman and Everywoman. Obama has laid some of the groundwork for this to happen, but but it’s not happening yet.

7.
On May 14th, 2008 at 1:20 pm, slappy magoo said:

Wow, Republicans are finally learning that only so many people can fail upwards only so many times. They may have reached a ceiling on how far up sh!t floats.

8.
On May 14th, 2008 at 1:26 pm, kevo said:

It sounds to me as though these early 21st century Republicans are facing the same fate as the early (c.1814) Federalist party when Americans deemed Federalists’ tendencies to elevate themselves over other more common Americans irrelevant and unworthy of any more political support. We all know the fate of the Federalists - they’re dead and gone! -Kevo

9.
On May 14th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, JC said:

Leadership changes? Perish the thought! Boehner and Cole are doing a GREAT job!

10.
On May 14th, 2008 at 1:44 pm, Steve said:

Curmudgeon said,

“Wait, I thought you said we could create our own reality just by closing our eyes real tight and tapping our heels together three times. You mean it doesn’t really work like that??”

You forgot the magic words, Curmudgeon—”There’s no place like home.”

And that’s where a lot of Boehner’s Babbling Misfits will be going after this year.

11.
On May 14th, 2008 at 1:51 pm, Eeyore said:

Curmudgeon said,

“Wait, I thought you said we could create our own reality just by closing our eyes real tight and tapping our heels together three times. You mean it doesn’t really work like that??””

I think the Republicans may have learned it is dangerous to tap your feet. Just ask Larry Craig.

12.
On May 14th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, Splitting Image said:

“And that’s why I think we should be a lot nicer to Hillary/Blue Dog democrats.”

Disagree.

I’m all in favour of being more supportive of conservatives in general, so long as they have a basic sense of morality I can live with, but I draw the line at Democrats who try to up their conservative “cred” by supporting the Republicans when they are betraying their supposed causes.

Clinton went over the line by supporting the Iraq war (as did most of the Blue Dogs) and not only refuses to admit her mistake, but compounds it by sabre-rattling with Iran.

If I have to choose between her and Chuck Hagel or Ron Paul, who oppose Bush’s Middle Eastern policy for fairly hardline conservative reasons, I will go with Hagel or Paul every time.

13.
On May 14th, 2008 at 3:16 pm, Lance said:

Bo-ner’s pain is my pleasure. It’s like a crisp dry wine.

All we need to handle the Blue Dogs is a Democratic President. Then they won’t have a stupid Executive to deal with.

14.
On May 14th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, Rich said:

I guess when the Rethugs switched off their alleged brains and went goose-stepping arm-in-arm down the oil-slicked road with the Decider they forgot where the switch is. Dumbocracy. It’s every man for himself boys, no one knows what to do - until the neocons work out something to create a state of emergency.

15.
On May 14th, 2008 at 4:16 pm, Always hopeful said:

It’s sad really, the Repugs have no earthly idea why the American public is no longer drinking the Kool-aide.

16.
On May 14th, 2008 at 4:26 pm, beep52 said:

Modern conservatism is simply not a viable approach to government — or anything else, for that matter. It all sounded good to some folks for a while, but not so much anymore. We’ll see in November just how many more lessons in the bankrupcy of conservative ideology the voting public needs.

17.
On May 14th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, toowearyforoutrage said:

Right leaning Dems winning in right leaning districts and the Dems building an unstoppable majority that way.

Newt would be so proud of us.

18.
On May 14th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, libra said:

Either way, people don’t want to vote for Republicans. — CB

*Or* support them with hard cash, thus creating a vicious circle and a downwards spiral. Couldn’t have happened to a nicer set of thugs.

Leave a Reply

The following tags are allowed in comments: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Commenters should familiarize themselves with this site's commenting policies.