July 28, 2006

The ‘poison pill’ we’ve been waiting for

Just to follow up for a moment on an earlier post, we were waiting to see what congressional [tag]Republicans[/tag] would tie to a [tag]minimum-wage[/tag] [tag]increase[/tag], if anything. GOP leaders could let Congress pass it straight, take credit for a popular move, and take a key campaign issue away from Dems.

Or they could play a silly little game. Guess which course they chose?

Congress would pass an increase in the minimum wage before leaving Washington for vacation, but only as part of a package rolling back taxes on the heirs of multimillionaires, a Senate leadership aide said Friday.

The GOP package would also contain a popular package of expiring tax breaks, including a research and development credit for businesses, and deductions for college tuition and state sales taxes.

The wage would increase from $5.15 to $7.25 per hour, phased in over the next two years, the aide said.

Who could have possibly imagined? Republicans will hold the first minimum-wage increase in nine years hostage, waiting for Dems to give millionaires and billionaires another tax cut.

“Its political blackmail to say the only way that minimum wage workers can get a raise is to give a tax giveaways to the wealthiest Americans,” said Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.). “Members of Congress raised their own pay no strings attached. Surely, common decency suggests that minimum wage workers deserve the same respect.”

Yes, “decency.” Good one, Sen. Kennedy.

It’s not altogether clear how this is going to unfold on the Hill, but let’s game the scenario out for a moment.

Republicans think they’re in a good situation here. If Dems acquiesce, the GOP gets to take a key campaign issue off the table and they get more tax cuts for the wealthy. If Dems balk, the GOP will say, “We tried to raise the minimum wage, but the Dems blocked our effort.”

House lawmakers were to discuss the package at an early afternoon session, while the Senate GOP aide professed confidence the bill could advance through the chamber next week.

The aide asked not to be identified publicly because of the ongoing closed strategy sessions on the bill. “It’s the one chance for Democrats who want to get a minimum wage increase,” the aide said.

This is a sucker’s bet. Typical voters don’t follow the details of the legislative process, but they’re familiar with the outcome. There’s no way in the world the electorate is going to believe that congressional Republicans really wanted to raise the minimum wage, after ignoring it for all these years, and Dems stood in the way.

So Dems should call the GOP’s bluff, because in reality, it’s the Dems who are in the stronger position here.

The only reason the issue is coming up at all is because Republicans are starting to sweat. Dems have no incentive to throw the GOP a life-preserver on this, especially with the majority is playing games. If Republicans offered a clean bill, Dems would be hard-pressed to block it, just so they could use the issue in November.

But fortunately, the GOP is incapable of seizing the opportunity. The solution for Dems is easy: block the GOP offer and run campaign ads talking about how the Republican Congress raised lawmakers’ salaries by over $3,000, while blocking a minimum-wage increase and demanding a tax break for Paris Hilton.

 
Discussion

What do you think? Leave a comment. Alternatively, write a post on your own weblog; this blog accepts trackbacks.

12 Comments
1.
On July 28th, 2006 at 3:20 pm, Lance said:

I’m with you CB. Hold out for a clean bill and be ready to spend in October to explain our votes.

2.
On July 28th, 2006 at 3:27 pm, KCinDC said:

Absolutely. It’s not like it’s even complicated to explain the Republicans’ transparent trickery here to the average voter.

3.
On July 28th, 2006 at 3:39 pm, Marilyn Gjerdrum said:

The US Congress serves corporate and fat-cat interests. They could care less about the citizens. They just sold off control of our ports to the Arabs last Friday in spite of public outcry less than two months ago. The public was diverted by the real-time war coverage. 21st century version of gladiator entertainment.
You really think any of them (including Kennedy) care about this nation? Get real, the republic is as dead as ancient Rome.

4.
On July 28th, 2006 at 4:04 pm, racerx said:

Right on, CB. Throw them an anvil.

Nobody is going to believe the Republicans if they say the Democrats blocked a raise for the working man. The counterpunch is all too easy, just scroll through the tax cuts they’ve passed and specifically how much Republican leaders got in tax cuts compared to the average American.

All Dems need to do is say: “Republicans have no credibility. If you want a wage increase AND fairer taxes, throw out these bums.

5.
On July 28th, 2006 at 4:32 pm, Daniel DiRito said:

The bottom line is that Republicans are not the Party of tax cuts…they are the Party that restructures tax burdens in order to provide added wealth to those who already posses the lions share of the wealth…while at the same time creating astronomical debt that will ultimately be apportioned to all Americans…a simple case of double dipping in my estimation.

Read full article here:

www.thoughttheater.com

6.
On July 28th, 2006 at 6:11 pm, lou said:

The Republicans have mastered this poison pill technique of legislating. Would it be possible for Congress to pass a law prohibiting the writing of such “dirty” bills? Why can’t they just put together a simple, clean bill that concisely addresses such issues as raising minimum wages?

7.
On July 28th, 2006 at 7:42 pm, Ed Stephan said:

I’ll grant we’re the “Tax and Spend” party if they’ll accept the “Borrow and Steal” party. A more nuanced version: “Tax Everybody fairly and Spend on Everybody wisely” vs. “Indebt Futute Generations through Borrowing and Make Life Even Easier for the Obscenely Rich By Stealing from Everybody Else”.

8.
On July 29th, 2006 at 6:19 am, lou said:

The House passed the bill. Contains a ton of giveaways to corporate interests including the coal companies. If the senate passes this shit, we need a revolution, not an election.

9.
On July 29th, 2006 at 7:42 am, KCinDC said:

Ugh. Since 21 Republicans voted against the monstrosity, the 34 Democrats who voted for it are fully responsible for the passage. What is wrong with these people?

10.
On July 29th, 2006 at 10:19 am, slip kid no more said:

What is it with Bean and Herseth?

Leave a Reply

The following tags are allowed in comments: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Commenters should familiarize themselves with this site's commenting policies. Also, please note that the comment section is not moderated by anyone; if someone is getting out of line, please report it to Steve. Readers are encouraged to keep the discussion civil.